As a class we were visited by urban
activist, Susan Quimpo (2016). Quimpo has spent her life working for social
justice in the Philippines. As a young woman Quimpo participated in street
theater as a form of resistance to the Marcos dynasty in the 1980’s. The
coupling of vast inequalities for Filipinos and the Duterte presidency has kept
Quimpo busy every since. Revision of historical accounts is one many lingering
effects from the American colonization from the early 1900s. Quimpo said she is
partnering with other organizations around Manila to interrupt the cycle of
historical revisionism by short informational and creative videos. In those
videos she shares true accounts of what took place during the Marcos regime
wherein Marcos enacted Martial Law. While the much of the country lived in
harsh conditions, the Marcos’s lived a lifestyle beyond ostentatious. (Quimpo,
2016).
Revising history, or “burying the past”
(Ileto, 1998) is a tactic of colonization that is influenced by white and male
privilege. When histories are left out or forgotten it is then easier for a
settler state to advance their agenda in a foreign site. That agenda includes assimilation,
which is related to white and male privilege. McIntosh quotes E. Minnich saying
that “whites are taught to think of their lives as morally neutral, normative,
and average, and also ideal, so that when we work to benefit others, this is
seen as work that will allow “them” to be more like “us”. (McIntosh, 1988). That sort of disconnection is paramount in the
process of assimilation, whereby a gap in the memory of a collective actually
expedites the process of hegemonic tutelage – a goal set out by President
McKinley in the Benevolent Assimilation Proclamation in 1898 (Zinn, 2008).
“Burying the past” disconnects and makes
invisible the narratives and experiences of
Indigenous Peoples (IP) of the Philippines as well. For non-indigenous
peoples to be able to claim land, IP must disappear. By making IP people
disappear they are dehumanized and furthermore it becomes acceptable to occupy
their land as their own. (Smith, 2015). The idea of making IP disappear serves
colonialist efforts and upholds the white supremacy and heteropatriarchy
systems that makes imperialism possible. In addressing the question: “Who are
the people of the Philippines and how as that changed over time?” (Mangahas and
Perez, 2016) our guest speakers grappled with the politics of recognition
(Coulthard, 2007). In Coulthard’s politics of recognition the colonized seek
recognition in order to gain the socioeconomic benefits that typically come along
with governmental tutelage. By petitioning to the dominating state the social
hierarchy of the colonizers, wherein indigenous people must assimilate or be
taken out, is reinforced.
We can connect this notion to the way
Ileto explains how circumstance can lead to surrender, he recounts the way
Bernardo Marques discussed his and general Filipino surrender at that end of
the Philippine -American War in 1902: “They surrendered for various things:
some because they were tired of staying in the fields; some through fear and
because they lost hope; because some of them had been injured or lost their
health through life in the field: and some because their families obliged them
to surrender.” (Ileto, 1998) A contemporary site where Filipinos have been lead
to surrender through the effects of colonization is in urban informal
settlements. Urban informal settlements are places where people who lack
“formal” education and “formal” work experience make their lives (Gonzales,
2016). Forced by circumstance young women and children engage in prostitution
as it empowers them with an income that they cannot find elsewhere. (Gonzales,
2016).
Twain asks in his article To The Person Sitting in Darkness “Can
we afford civilization?” (Twain, 2002). I ask: how are we and has civilization
been defined and used? Who has defined it? Is civilization being defined from a
place of white supremacy and heteropatriarchy? On a class outing we visited the
site of former Filipino Revolutionary and first President of the post-Spanish
colonial rule Emilio Aguinaldo. As a symbol of gratitude to the Americans the
colors of the Filipino flag reflect the colors of the American flag – a flag
that in my opinion has been exhausted in its promotion of an idea of “civilization”.
Works Cited:
Coulthard, G. S.
(2007). Subjects of empire: Indigenous peoples and the ‘politics of
recognition’in Canada. Contemporary
Political Theory, 6(4),
437-460.
Gonzales, C. (2016, July 28). Urban
Informal Settlers. Lecture presented in Philippines, Manila.
Ileto, R.C. (1998). The Philippine-American War,
Friendship and Forgetting. In Shaw, A.V. & Francia, L.H. Vestiges of war.
(pp. 3-21)
Mangahas, M. and Perez, P. (2016, July 28). Indigenous
Peoples. Lecture presented in Philippines, Manila.
McIntosh, P. (1988). White privilege and male
privilege: A personal account of coming to see the correspondences through work
in women’s studies. In K. Tupper, Introduction to women’s studies: Women 200 (2nd
ed.) (pp.62-71). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Quimpo, S. (2016, July 27). Martial
Law. Lecture presented in Philippines, Manila.
Smith, A. (2015).
Heteropatriarchy and the three pillars of white supremacy: Rethinking women of
color organizing. Transformations:
Feminist Pathways to Global Change, 264.
Twain, M. (2002). To the person
sitting in darkness. In Shaw, A.V. & Francia, L.H. Vestiges of War (pp.
57-68). New York: New York Press.

No comments:
Post a Comment